<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Comments on snippet: 'Making Daniel Brodie's singleton recipe work with keyword arguments'</title>
    <description>Snipplr comments feed</description>
    <link>https://ipv6.snipplr.com/</link>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 02:49:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>n3x said on 02/Jun/2007</title>
      <link>https://ipv6.snipplr.com/view/2776/making-daniel-brodies-singleton-recipe-work-with-keyword-arguments</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I just realized that this is probably good enough in practice if you merely want to avoid creating multiple instances for equivalent parameters, but not if you have to make absolutely sure that there are no duplicate instances (since potential keyword and positional arguments aren't disjoint sets). As it is, you can use appropriate coding conventions as a workaround.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 08:03:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ipv6.snipplr.com/view/2776/making-daniel-brodies-singleton-recipe-work-with-keyword-arguments</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
